Two products, Hireflix and VidCruiter, were each named in all 6 of the 6 answers we collected, the only tools in this category to hit a clean 100% when we asked ChatGPT and Gemini which video interview software to use.
We ran this on 2026-08-06. We put six buyer questions about video interview software to ChatGPT and Gemini, gave each question one live web search, and logged every product named and every source domain cited. Thirteen distinct products came up across the six answers, but only five appeared in at least half of them: Hireflix (6 of 6), VidCruiter (6 of 6), Jobma (5 of 6), HireVue (4 of 6), and Willo (3 of 6). Only ChatGPT and Gemini were queried, so this is their view, not the whole internet's.
The full list, counted
| Product | Named in | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Hireflix | 6 of 6 | 100% |
| VidCruiter | 6 of 6 | 100% |
| Jobma | 5 of 6 | 83% |
| HireVue | 4 of 6 | 67% |
| Willo | 3 of 6 | 50% |
| Avature | 2 of 6 | 33% |
| Clovers AI | 1 of 6 | 17% |
| CodeSignal | 1 of 6 | 17% |
| CodeSignal Interview | 1 of 6 | 17% |
The counts are out of six answers. One brand, CodeSignal, appears twice under two labels: CodeSignal (1 of 6) and CodeSignal Interview (1 of 6), because the assistants wrote its name both ways across different questions. We kept both rows rather than fold them into a 2 the data never recorded as a single number. Four more products also landed at 1 of 6 but sit outside the table: Harver, ScreeningHive, Spark Hire, and Workable.
How the shortlist changed with the question
The wording of the question moved the answer a lot, and that is the most useful thing in this data. Only Hireflix and VidCruiter survived every phrasing, named in all 6 of 6 sub-questions. Jobma held 5 of 6, missing only the open-ended "video interview software recommendations." Everything below that churned.
The bare "best video interview software" pulled the widest net, 8 products in one answer, and it was the only place three names appeared at all: Workable, Spark Hire, and CodeSignal Interview each showed up here and nowhere else in the six.
"Best video interview software for small teams" did the opposite and returned the tightest list of the whole set, just 3 products: Hireflix, Jobma, and VidCruiter. Notably, HireVue, a 4 of 6 name overall, was absent from the small-teams answer entirely, and also absent from "what video interview software should I use."
Free and affordable are not the same question to these assistants, and the data shows it plainly. "Best free video interview software" surfaced 6 products and was the only place ScreeningHive appeared. "Most affordable video interview software" surfaced just 4, and every one of them (Jobma, Hireflix, VidCruiter, HireVue) was already a mainstream name. The free question reached for a niche tool; the affordable question stayed with the establishment.
Willo traced the free-tier pattern too, named in "best", "best free", and "recommendations" but in none of the small-teams, "what should I use", or "most affordable" answers, 3 of 6 overall. The open "video interview software recommendations" query behaved like a catch-all, naming 8 products and being the sole home of three more: Harver, Clovers AI, and CodeSignal. Avature was the one name to appear in exactly two questions, "what should I use" and "recommendations," 2 of 6 in total.
Where the answers came from
Thirteen source domains fed the six answers, and three were cited in every single one: reddit.com (6 of 6), the roundup hiretruffle.com (6 of 6), and the roundup selectsoftwarereviews.com (6 of 6). Community threads and independent roundups, not vendor marketing, formed the backbone.
Reddit and Quora carried the community weight, cited in 6 of 6 and 2 of 6 answers. The independent roundups and analysts did the rest: hiretruffle.com and selectsoftwarereviews.com at 6 of 6, gartner.com at 5 of 6, peoplemanagingpeople.com at 4 of 6, and hyrefast.ai at 1 of 6.
The classic software review directories barely registered. G2 was cited in 1 of 6 answers, and Capterra was not cited once, 0 of 6. If you assumed your G2 or Capterra profile is what gets you into an AI answer for video interview software, this sample says otherwise.
Here is the key insight: several vendors' own domains were cited as sources, and every one of those vendors got named. vidcruiter.com was cited in 3 of 6 answers and VidCruiter was named in 6 of 6. willo.video was cited in 4 of 6 and Willo named in 3 of 6. hirevue.com was cited in 3 of 6 and HireVue named in 4 of 6. Even jobma.com, cited in just 1 of 6, and screeninghive.com at 2 of 6, tracked with their products being named. Your own published pages can become the evidence the assistant quotes back.
But the sharpest fact cuts the other way. Hireflix, tied for first at 6 of 6, had no owned domain in the source list at all. Its perfect score came entirely from third parties: reddit.com, hiretruffle.com, selectsoftwarereviews.com, gartner.com, and peoplemanagingpeople.com. You can lead this category in AI answers without a single citation to your own site. And note that willo.video was cited in the "most affordable" answer while Willo itself was not named there, proof that being a source and being the recommendation are two different wins.
What gets a video interview tool named
Named is decided by the source list, not by market share. In this category the sources that mattered were reddit.com (6 of 6), hiretruffle.com (6 of 6), selectsoftwarereviews.com (6 of 6), and gartner.com (5 of 6). A vendor that is discussed in those exact places gets named; a vendor that is not, does not, however big it is.
So the practical move for a marketing team here is narrow. Get into the specific roundups these answers quote, be part of the Reddit conversation that is cited in every answer, and publish the comparison content that becomes a citable source, the way vidcruiter.com and hirevue.com did. Chasing a directory profile on G2 (1 of 6) or Capterra (0 of 6) is not where these answers are coming from.
Where Glotier fits
Glotier does not sell video interview software, so we are correctly absent from all 6 of these answers, and we would not pretend otherwise. What you just read is the whole point of Glotier though: the same six-question sweep, the same product and source counts, run on whatever category you actually sell in. It shows you which names ChatGPT and Gemini hand a buyer, and the exact pages behind each one. The check is free, needs no account, and takes about a minute.