Measured · 2026-08-07

Who ChatGPT and Gemini recommend for fraud detection software

We put 6 buyer questions about fraud detection software to ChatGPT and Gemini. Only ComplyAdvantage was named in all 6 answers. Here is the full list, the pages the answers were built from, and what it means whether or not your product is on it.

Answers read
6
Products named
13
Top source
complyadvantage.com

ComplyAdvantage was the only fraud detection tool that ChatGPT and Gemini named in all six of six buyer answers we measured on 2026-08-07. We asked the two assistants six different ways of asking for the best fraud detection software, gave each question one live web search, and wrote down every product and every source domain that came back. One name showed up in every answer. Five more showed up in five of the six.

Behind ComplyAdvantage at 6 of 6 sits a tight second tier that moves as a block: Featurespace, Feedzai, Hawk:AI, Onfido and Sardine were each named in 5 of 6 answers, or 83%. Six products did almost all the work. The drop to seventh is steep: Abrigo landed in 3 of 6 answers (50%), and no other tool was named more than twice. On any single fraud-software question, a buyer mostly sees the same handful of names in a new order, not a fresh field.

When the question changes, the list changes

The plain "best fraud detection software" question returned eight names. One of them, Outseer Fraud Manager, was named in just 1 of 6 answers and under no other phrasing. Abrigo also showed up here, part of its 3 of 6 total.

Asking for "best free fraud detection software" returned the identical core six, 6 of 6 the same names as the general question, and added zero new products. The word "free" gave the buyer no new options at all.

"Most affordable fraud detection software" kept the same core six and widened it by two: Kount and Signifyd. Kount was named in only this one answer of the six (1 of 6). Signifyd appeared twice in the whole study (2 of 6), here and in the small-teams question, and nowhere else.

The sharpest break came from "best fraud detection software for small teams." That answer shared just one name with the core six, ComplyAdvantage, and dropped the other five completely. In their place: Signifyd, Fingerprint, Chargeflow and iDenfy. Fingerprint, Chargeflow and iDenfy were each named in 1 of 6 answers, all three only here. Add the words "small teams" and five of the six default names disappear.

So five products entered the entire study through one phrasing each: Outseer Fraud Manager through "best," Kount through "most affordable," and Fingerprint, Chargeflow and iDenfy through "small teams," each named in 1 of 6 answers. A buyer who only ever asks one of these six questions sees a genuinely different shortlist than a buyer who asks another.

Where the answers came from

Two domains fed all six answers: reddit.com and complyadvantage.com, each cited in 6 of 6. In a category built on regulated, enterprise-grade software, the single most-cited source is a public forum thread. Reddit was not a tiebreaker here, it was the floor.

Gartner was next at 5 of 6 answers, the only analyst domain in the set. After that the citations spread across vendor roundups and blogs: shadowdragon.io and transunion.com at 4 of 6 each, then a cluster at 2 of 6 that included f5.com, salv.com, supervizor.com, trustmi.ai, the community site quora.com, and the government page counterfraud.gov.au. In total, 16 distinct domains fed the six answers across 42 citations, about seven sources per answer.

The key insight is one vendor's own domain. complyadvantage.com was cited in all 6 answers, and the product ComplyAdvantage was named in all 6. It is the only company here whose own site fed the answers and whose product also finished on top. Other vendor domains fed answers too, shadowdragon.io in 4 and transunion.com in 4, but those pages are roundups that list other companies, so ShadowDragon and TransUnion were never named themselves. ComplyAdvantage both wrote a cited page and was the name on it.

Review directories barely registered. g2.com was cited once, in 1 of 6 answers, the small-teams question. Capterra did not appear at all. The buyer-review sites that dominate ordinary B2B software search were nearly invisible to these AI answers.

What it takes to get named

If you sell in this category, the measurement points at a specific list, not a vague one. The six answers were built from 16 domains. Getting named means being present, by name, on those exact pages: the Reddit and Quora threads (cited in 6 and 2 of 6 answers), the Gartner page (5 of 6), and the vendor roundups on shadowdragon.io and transunion.com (4 of 6 each).

ComplyAdvantage shows the ceiling and one way to reach it. It was named in 6 of 6 answers, and its own domain was one of the two sources cited every time. Publishing your own clear category page is worth doing, because at least one company here got named partly off its own site. But the other five core names, each at 5 of 6, got there with none of their own domains cited, which means threads and roundups carried them.

Nothing in this data rewards market share on its own. The assistants did not weigh revenue or customer count. They read a handful of pages and named whoever those pages named. Fingerprint, Chargeflow and iDenfy each earned a place off a single mention (1 of 6). For a newer vendor that is good news and a clear target: you do not need to outgrow the incumbents, you need to be on the pages the assistants read. The source list, not the market, set the shortlist.

The full list, counted

ProductNamed inShare
ComplyAdvantage6 of 6100%
Featurespace5 of 683%
Feedzai5 of 683%
Hawk:AI5 of 683%
Onfido5 of 683%
Sardine5 of 683%
Abrigo3 of 650%
Signifyd2 of 633%
Chargeflow1 of 617%
Fingerprint1 of 617%
iDenfy1 of 617%
Kount1 of 617%
Outseer Fraud Manager1 of 617%

Where Glotier fits, honestly

Glotier is not in this list, and it should not be. We do not sell fraud detection software, so ChatGPT and Gemini were right to leave us out of all 6 answers. If we appeared here, the measurement would be broken, not working.

This page is exactly what we run for a customer's own category, though. Six ways a buyer might ask, the assistants that answer, every product and every source written down, so you can see whether you land in 6 of 6 or 0 of 6, and which thread or roundup you would need to be on to move. If you sell fraud detection software, the check above took about a minute, needs no account, and is free. You can run the same one on your own name.

The questions we asked

One live web search per question, put to serper+or:chatgpt,gemini on 2026-08-07. 6 of 6 came back with an answer we could read. Whether a product was named is decided by looking for it in the answer text, not by asking a model for its opinion.

  1. best fraud detection software
  2. best fraud detection software for small teams
  3. what fraud detection software should I use
  4. best free fraud detection software
  5. most affordable fraud detection software
  6. fraud detection software recommendations

Questions people ask

What is the best fraud detection software according to AI right now?
In our 2026-08-07 measurement, ComplyAdvantage was named in 6 of 6 buyer answers (100%) by ChatGPT and Gemini. Featurespace, Feedzai, Hawk:AI, Onfido and Sardine followed, each named in 5 of 6 (83%). Abrigo was the only other tool named more than once, at 3 of 6 (50%).
Does asking for free or affordable fraud detection change what AI recommends?
A little. 'Best free fraud detection software' returned the identical core six and added no new names (6 of 6 the same as the general question). 'Most affordable fraud detection software' kept those six and added Kount and Signifyd, and Kount appeared in only that one answer (1 of 6). So the pricing words barely moved the list.
Which fraud detection tools does AI recommend for small teams?
The 'small teams' answer looked almost nothing like the general one. It shared only ComplyAdvantage with the core six and named Signifyd, Fingerprint, Chargeflow and iDenfy instead. Fingerprint, Chargeflow and iDenfy were each named in just 1 of 6 answers, and only under this phrasing, so five of the six default names dropped out.
Where do ChatGPT and Gemini get their fraud detection recommendations?
From 16 domains across 42 citations, about seven per answer. reddit.com and complyadvantage.com were cited in 6 of 6 answers, Gartner in 5 of 6, and shadowdragon.io and transunion.com in 4 of 6 each. The review directory G2 was cited once (1 of 6) and Capterra not at all, so buyer-review sites had almost no weight here.
How do I get my fraud detection product recommended by AI?
Be named on the pages these answers cite. The Reddit and Quora threads (6 and 2 of 6), the Gartner page (5 of 6), and the roundups on shadowdragon.io and transunion.com (4 of 6 each) fed most answers. ComplyAdvantage was the only tool named partly off its own domain, cited in 6 of 6. Market share was not a factor, the source list was: products named in just 1 of 6 answers got there off a single mention.

Do you sell in fraud detection software? Find out whether you are in that list.

Paste your domain and watch the same run happen for your own buyer questions: which of the three assistants names you, who gets named instead, and the exact pages those answers were built from. Free, no card, no account for the first check.

Show my visibility

For reference, ComplyAdvantage was named in 6 of the 6 answers we read.

Start with Solo

Get Glotier Solo

Everything on this page is one measurement, taken by hand, on one day. Solo runs it for your product every day and writes the work it points to.

  • The Citation Agent: which of your pages an assistant can actually cite, and the fix for each
  • A paragraph-quality read of your pages: what an assistant can lift whole, and where a claim is missing its source
  • An X agent and a Reddit agent: the live threads worth answering in your category, with a reply drafted for each
  • A daily check, and an article written from what it measured that day, ready to publish
  • The same buyer questions re-asked every day, with every source page behind each answer

Track 3 products and up to 150 buyer questions across ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity. $39/month.

Cancel any time. Not for you? Email us within 7 days of a charge and we refund it in full. Refund policy

Not ready to pay? The check is free, with no card and no account. Run it on your own product.