Measured · 2026-08-06

Who ChatGPT and Gemini recommend for URL shortener software

We put 6 buyer questions about URL shortener software to ChatGPT and Gemini. Only Bitly was named in all 6 answers. Here is the full list, the pages the answers were built from, and what it means whether or not your product is on it.

Answers read
6
Products named
14
Top source
zapier.com

Bitly was named in all 6 of the 6 answers we collected for URL shortener software, the only tool ChatGPT and Gemini recommended every single time.

We ran this measurement on 2026-08-06: six buyer questions about URL shortener software, put to ChatGPT and Gemini with one live web search behind each answer, and every product named plus every source domain recorded. Across the six answers, 14 different products got a mention. Bitly took 6 of 6 (100%). The next name, TinyURL, showed up in 4 of 6 (67%).

Below those two, the list thins fast. Linkly and Short.io tied at 3 of 6 (50%) each. Every other product, ten of them, was named exactly once, 1 of 6 (17%): 1Link, CutMe Short, Cuttly, Dub, Dub Links, Foxly, is.gd, JumpTo, Linkkit, and Replug. So four tools carried the category and a long tail of ten split the remaining single mentions.

One naming quirk is worth flagging up front. The tool "Dub" appeared twice under two different labels. It came up as "Dub Links" in the plain "best" question and as "Dub" in the "most affordable" question. We kept them as two separate rows rather than merge them into a "2 of 6" the data never actually produced. Each label scored 1 of 6.

How the answer changed when the question changed

Bitly was the only constant, named in all 6 phrasings. Everything else moved with the wording, and that movement is the whole story.

The vaguest question got the narrowest answer. "what url shortener software should I use" returned a single product: Bitly, 1 of 6. No second option, no runner-up, just one name.

The broadest question got the widest answer. "url shortener software recommendations" named 7 products in one go, and 5 of them appeared nowhere else in the study: CutMe Short, Cuttly, Foxly, JumpTo, and Linkkit. One word, "recommendations," surfaced a cluster of five tools that no other buyer phrasing pulled up.

"Free" and "affordable" are not the same query to an AI. The "best free url shortener software" answer named Short.io, TinyURL, is.gd, and Bitly (4 tools), and is.gd, a stripped-down genuinely free shortener, appeared only here. The "most affordable" answer named TinyURL, Short.io, Linkly, Bitly, Replug, and Dub (6 tools), and Replug and Dub, both paid tools with cheap plans, appeared only here. The two sets share Short.io, TinyURL, and Bitly, but the word "free" pulled a free tool while the word "affordable" pulled cheap paid tools. Same buyer intent, different vocabulary, different shortlist.

Two more single-question names round it out. "best url shortener software for small teams" was the only place 1Link showed up (1 of 6). The plain "best url shortener software" was the only place Dub Links showed up (1 of 6). If you only ever checked the one phrase "best url shortener software," you would never learn that a buyer asking for "recommendations" is shown seven tools, five of which you would otherwise never see.

The source map: who fed the answers

One roundup fed everything. zapier.com was cited in all 6 of 6 answers, the single most-used source in the study.

Community threads did most of the rest of the work. reddit.com was cited in 5 of 6 answers and quora.com in 4 of 6. Add efficient.app (4 of 6), a comparison roundup, and you have three non-vendor sources sitting behind two-thirds or more of the answers each. The rest of the supporting cast was thin: techrepublic.com, getapp.com, serchen.com, and youtube.com were each cited twice (2 of 6), and canva.com, flyn.to, and workload.co once each.

Here is the key insight. The vendors' own domains fed the answers, and every vendor whose domain was cited got named. bitly.com was a source in 5 of 6 answers and Bitly was named in 6 of 6. linklyhq.com fed 4 of 6 and Linkly was named in 3. short.io fed 3 of 6 and Short.io was named in 3. tinyurl.com fed 1 and TinyURL was named in 4. Four vendor domains cited, four vendors named. Their own published comparison pages are doing citing work for them.

The classic review directories were mostly absent. G2 and Capterra did not appear in a single one of the 6 answers. GetApp, a software review directory, did appear, but only twice (2 of 6), alongside the software listing site serchen.com (2 of 6). If you have been buying G2 and Capterra placement to win this category inside AI answers, this sample says that spend is not what these assistants are reading.

What actually gets a shortener named

The pattern across all 6 answers is blunt: you get named when you are present in the small handful of pages the assistant reads, and not otherwise. The winning sources here were one Zapier roundup (6 of 6), Reddit and Quora threads (5 and 4 of 6), a couple of comparison sites, and the vendors' own domains. Market share is not on that list. Bitly leads partly because it is big, but it also has its own domain feeding 5 of 6 answers and a foothold in the Zapier and Reddit sources everything else is competing for.

For a marketing person in this category, that turns "improve our AI visibility" into something you can actually do. Get into the Zapier-style roundup that fed all 6 answers. Be the answer in the relevant Reddit and Quora threads that fed 5 and 4 of 6. Publish the comparison page on your own domain, because linklyhq.com (4 of 6) and short.io (3 of 6) show that a vendor's own pages get cited and pull the product in with them. The 14-name list is not fixed: five of those names only exist in the results because one "recommendations" query happened to read a page they were on.

Where Glotier fits

Glotier does not sell URL shortener software, so we are correctly absent from all 6 of these answers. We would be worried if we were not, because we have not earned a place in any source a buyer's question actually reads for this category.

This measurement is exactly the thing we run for a customer's own category. Same six-question fan-out, same record of who got named and which domains fed each answer, pointed at the words your buyers actually type. If you want to see your category the way we just saw this one, the check is free, no account, about a minute.

The full list, counted

This table shows the four tools named more than once, plus five of the ten that were named a single time; the full single-mention set is listed earlier in this page. "Dub" and "Dub Links" are the same brand, kept as two rows because that is how the assistants labelled it across two separate questions.

ProductNamed inShare
Bitly6 of 6100%
TinyURL4 of 667%
Linkly3 of 650%
Short.io3 of 650%
Dub1 of 617%
Dub Links1 of 617%
Replug1 of 617%
is.gd1 of 617%
1Link1 of 617%

The questions we asked

One live web search per question, put to serper+or:chatgpt,gemini on 2026-08-06. 6 of 6 came back with an answer we could read. Whether a product was named is decided by looking for it in the answer text, not by asking a model for its opinion.

  1. best url shortener software
  2. best url shortener software for small teams
  3. what url shortener software should I use
  4. best free url shortener software
  5. most affordable url shortener software
  6. url shortener software recommendations

Questions people ask

What is the best URL shortener software according to ChatGPT and Gemini?
Bitly. It was named in all 6 of the 6 answers we measured on 2026-08-06, the only tool ChatGPT and Gemini recommended in every question. TinyURL was second at 4 of 6, and Linkly and Short.io tied for third at 3 of 6 each.
What is the best free URL shortener software?
When we asked specifically for the "best free" option, ChatGPT and Gemini named four tools: Short.io, TinyURL, is.gd, and Bitly. is.gd, a stripped-down genuinely free shortener, showed up only in this free-specific question and in none of the other five.
What is the most affordable URL shortener software?
The "most affordable" question returned six tools: TinyURL, Short.io, Linkly, Bitly, Replug, and Dub. Replug and Dub, both paid tools with cheap plans, appeared only in this affordability question, whereas the "best free" answer instead surfaced is.gd. "Free" and "affordable" produced different shortlists.
Why do I get a different list of shorteners when I word the question differently?
Because the answer follows the wording. Across our six questions only Bitly was constant at 6 of 6. "what url shortener software should I use" returned just one tool (Bitly), while "url shortener software recommendations" returned seven, including five (CutMe Short, Cuttly, Foxly, JumpTo, Linkkit) that appeared in no other question. Checking a single phrase misses most of the picture.
Which sources do AI assistants cite when recommending URL shorteners?
In our measurement zapier.com fed all 6 of 6 answers, reddit.com 5 of 6, and quora.com and efficient.app 4 of 6 each. Vendor domains also fed answers: bitly.com in 5 of 6 and linklyhq.com in 4 of 6, and every vendor domain cited got its product named. G2 and Capterra did not appear in a single answer; GetApp appeared only twice.

Do you sell in URL shortener software? Find out whether you are in that list.

Paste your domain and watch the same run happen for your own buyer questions: which of the three assistants names you, who gets named instead, and the exact pages those answers were built from. Free, no card, no account for the first check.

Show my visibility

For reference, Bitly was named in 6 of the 6 answers we read.

Start with Solo

Get Glotier Solo

Everything on this page is one measurement, taken by hand, on one day. Solo runs it for your product every day and writes the work it points to.

  • The Citation Agent: which of your pages an assistant can actually cite, and the fix for each
  • A paragraph-quality read of your pages: what an assistant can lift whole, and where a claim is missing its source
  • An X agent and a Reddit agent: the live threads worth answering in your category, with a reply drafted for each
  • A daily check, and an article written from what it measured that day, ready to publish
  • The same buyer questions re-asked every day, with every source page behind each answer

Track 3 products and up to 150 buyer questions across ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity. $39/month.

Cancel any time. Not for you? Email us within 7 days of a charge and we refund it in full. Refund policy

Not ready to pay? The check is free, with no card and no account. Run it on your own product.