Glotier tells you whether ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity name your product when buyers ask what to use in your category. It puts your buyers' real questions to all three as live web queries, records whether you were named and by which of them, which competitors were named instead, and which pages each answer was built from.

How does Glotier check AI visibility?

It runs one live web search per question. ChatGPT and Gemini read the identical results, and Perplexity runs its own retrieval because it does not accept results handed to it. Whether your product is named is decided by a literal presence check on the answer text rather than by asking a model for its opinion, so the number cannot be inflated by a model being agreeable. You can also connect your own ChatGPT or Claude key and have the questions run through your account instead.

Why ask three assistants instead of one?

Because they disagree. In our own study, across the 39 of 40 buying questions where all three answered, all three named the same product only 30% of the time and 47% of products were named by exactly one assistant. Checking a single assistant shows you 58% to 65% of the products named across the three, so a founder who checks ChatGPT, sees their name and relaxes has measured one engine on one phrasing.

Is Glotier free to use?

The check is free with no signup. Paid plans start at $9.99 a month (Fast, one product), then Solo at $39, Studio at $99 and Agency at $249. Every paid plan covers the daily check and the content the agent writes.

Does Glotier make up data about my product?

No. Every result comes from observed data: the live search results, the answers the assistants actually returned, and the sources they cited. It does not invent metrics, ratings or engine claims, and when a measurement has not run it says so rather than printing a zero.

Anyone selling something buyers research before choosing, where the category has enough alternatives that an assistant has to pick a shortlist: software, tools, e-commerce, and services. Founders, marketers and agencies all use it, and the work is the same at any size. It is not useful for local or in-person businesses, where maps and reviews decide the outcome instead.

Can I just check ChatGPT myself?

For a one-time look, yes, and the free check on this page does it for you with the source pages shown. What you cannot do by hand is track it over time, cover ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity together, or see the pages behind each answer, which is where being named is actually decided.

How often does the answer change?

Often enough that a one-time check is unreliable. On our own tracking, well under half of the source pages behind a question are still there a week and a half later, so the answer moves as its sources move. A screenshot is a single frame of a moving picture.

Why do I need more than one assistant?

Because they disagree. Across our measured runs, ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity name the same product together far less than they each name something the others miss, so checking one tells you little about the others your buyers use.

What does a tool see that I cannot?

The source pages behind each answer, the trend over time, and who is named instead of you, all at once, across the assistants, every day. By hand you see one answer, once. A tool sees the pattern and the task list.

Do it by hand, or track it

AI visibility tracking vs checking ChatGPT by hand

You can open ChatGPT, ask for the best tool in your category, and see whether it names you. That is worth doing once. As a way to actually know where you stand it falls apart fast, and here is exactly where, measured on our own runs, plus what a tool sees that a manual check cannot.

3: assistants that disagree more than they agree on who to name
Daily: how fast the answer moves as the source pages behind it change
Free: the first check, no card, with the source pages shown

One check, on one assistant, is not the answer

Ask the same buying question of ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity and you do not get one answer, you get three that mostly disagree. Across our own measured runs the three name the same product together far less often than they each name something the others miss, so a single check on a single assistant is a coin flip you are reading as a verdict.

The honest question is not whether ChatGPT named you today, it is how often you are named across the assistants your buyers actually use, and who is named instead. You cannot answer that by hand in one sitting.

It is a moving target, so a one-time check is stale in days

An AI answer is built from the source pages the assistant pulled that day, and that set is not stable. On our own tracking, well under half of the sources behind a question are still there a week and a half later. The answer you screenshotted on Monday can be a different answer, from different sources, by the next week.

That is what manual checking hides most: it feels precise because you saw it yourself, and it is out of date almost immediately. Knowing where you stand means watching the trend, not freezing one frame of it.

You cannot see why, and you cannot scale it

Being named is downstream of the source pages an answer is built from. By hand you see the answer, not the pages behind it, so you learn that you have a problem and nothing about how to fix it. Those pages are the task list, and a manual check throws them away.

And the real job does not fit in a browser tab: ten buyer questions, across three assistants, every day, recording who was named and which pages each answer leaned on. By hand for one product that is an afternoon a day. For more than one it is not happening.

When by hand is fine, and when it is not

Checking once, for one product, out of curiosity, do it by hand, it costs nothing and the free check below does the same thing with the sources shown. The moment you need to know whether you are gaining or losing ground over time, catch the week a competitor starts getting named instead of you, or see the exact pages to go earn a mention on, a manual check gives you none of that and a tool is the only honest way to get it.

What Glotier does instead

Glotier asks ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity your buyers' real questions as live web queries, records which of the three named you and which named a competitor, and shows every source page each answer was built from, because those pages are where being named is won. The first check is free with no card, and Fast keeps it running daily on one product for $9.99, the best price for a real daily check.

Start with Fast

Watch it daily for $9.99/month

Start with the free check on your own product, no account. If it is worth watching over time, Fast keeps checking every day for $9.99.

A daily visibility check on ChatGPT and Gemini, for one product
The real buyer questions in your category, tracked so a change means something
An article written from what it measured that day
Drafted posts that point at it, which you approve and post yourself

One product, checked every day on ChatGPT and Gemini. $9.99/month. Add Perplexity and the Citation Agent whenever you want, on Solo.

Get Fast, $9.99/month Compare the plans

Cancel any time. Not for you? Email us within 7 days of a charge and we refund it in full. Refund policy

Not ready to pay? The check is free, with no card and no account. Run it on your own product.

Questions people ask

Can I just check ChatGPT myself?: For a one-time look, yes, and the free check on this page does it for you with the source pages shown. What you cannot do by hand is track it over time, cover ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity together, or see the pages behind each answer, which is where being named is actually decided.
How often does the answer change?: Often enough that a one-time check is unreliable. On our own tracking, well under half of the source pages behind a question are still there a week and a half later, so the answer moves as its sources move. A screenshot is a single frame of a moving picture.
Why do I need more than one assistant?: Because they disagree. Across our measured runs, ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity name the same product together far less than they each name something the others miss, so checking one tells you little about the others your buyers use.
What does a tool see that I cannot?: The source pages behind each answer, the trend over time, and who is named instead of you, all at once, across the assistants, every day. By hand you see one answer, once. A tool sees the pattern and the task list.

Keep reading